There is Twillo (thanks John) that uses my beloved card metaphor to allow teams to share. ” But GTD team practice is a pallid picture of the promise.Īnd don’t forget the apps. In a way, like senior executives who encounter a new business fad, we can kill the idea of needing team GTD with “Really, we’ve always been doing. Yes, GTD has “Waiting For” buckets, and we all use address books and jot down notes about when and why we met someone.
We don’t see shared GTD systems disrupting industries. But we don’t see shared GTD systems, CRMs are not really GTD. CRM systems as Peter Sims describe’s A.H.’s, look a lot like shared GTD systems. There should be dramatic increasing benefits of people employing GTD TOGETHER.Perhaps too much individual-contributor execution when the world is becoming network centric.
When GTD people are embedded in get-it-done corporate cultures, team building gets crowded out by relentless execution. sees network power as coming from the outer-most edges of the network. Because we GTDers are focused on seeing the world outside-in and keeping our projects moving, we don’t have a GTD equivalent of CRM, or a strategy to exploit networks, in particular, a strategy like Andreessen Horowitz’s.Three thoughts came to mind about GTD in reading this article: The title sound bite of this post comes from Peter’s article. Just read a very interesting MEDIUM article by Peter Sims: How Andreessen Horowitz Is Disrupting Silicon Valleyabout how venture capital is being disrupted by talent management driven by CRM (Customer Requirements Management) systems.
0 kommentar(er)
